IINET Buyers Club a Stakeholder Analysis †Myassignmenthelp.Com

Question: Discuss About the IINET Dallas Buyers Club? Answer: Introduction: This particular case is about the movie Dallas Buyers Club, the copyright of which is won by the Voltage Pictures and the internet pirates or iiNet customers, who are alleged to download the movie over the internet. Of about 4726 customers of iiNet have been alleged to download the movie over the internet and this case was finally over in the year 2016 in February 11th and the verdict of the court was in a way which makes clear that the piracy have won over the copyright. There were more than 4700 customers who were caught illegally sharing the movie over the internet, but the verdict was in favour of them as the Australian court dismissed the claim of the copyright owners Voltage Pictures (Jean et al., 2013). The policy that applies to the law is online exclusive rights infringement and this case was launched in the year 2012 by Voltage Pictures against six service providers of the internet among which the main party was iiNet. The film was buffered with the help of the BitTorrent and IP address of 4726 customers was tracked down (The Sydney Morning Herald, 2017). In April, 2015 it was told that Dallas Buyers Club can only take the charges form the customers for downloading the film and the problem with the case is that, DBS didnt had the IP address of the buyer and for getting the IP address, the charge that DBC has to pay to the court amounted to $600,000 (The Sydney Morning Herald, 2017). In this particular assignment, the problems regarding the policy have been identified and also the stakeholders of the organization have been identified and the roles of the stakeholders are also analysed and how they influence the policy. Problems related to the policy: Copyright infringement is a centralized communal basis of action. The infringement of copyright is a process which is related to duplication of the original work that has been performed or has been reproduced (Pallante, 2012). In this particular case, the copyright infringement related to DBS has been indentified and in this particular case, it can be seen that the movie was released in the internet with the help of BitTorrent and downloaded from the internet service provider sites like iiNet. There are various problems that are related to the policy were discovered as it was passed in the court of Australian law and various problems identified related to the policy are discussed below: Financial: The financial problems that are related to the law is that the Dallas Buyers Club movie will lose big market due to the leakage of the film over the internet and as the seeding of the movie is done with the help of the BitTorrent, there are many such potential viewers of the movie who downloaded the film over the internet and watched the movie and as a result they didnt visit the theatre to watch the film (Borten and Wallack, 2014). For this reason, the movie lost a huge amount of potential viewers and suffered a great loss due to the problem in the policy making of the court. They also had to take the money from the iiNet customers for watching the movie a little cum of $ 20 from each customer which is just a little amount while compared with the loss of Dallas Buyers Club. Technical: The technical difficulty related to the policy is that, the piracy over the internet will increase due to the decision that has been taken and also more and more movies have the chances to get leaked in the future as the verdict of the court was against Dallas Buyers Club (Pascale, 2015). The movie pirates in future can leak more movies over the internet and they can seed more movies with the help of Bit Torrent. The technical issues that are also related to the case are that already movie industry since the year 2006 has lost a lot of revenue for the reason of piracy and as the verdict of DBC case is not against the movie pirates, this will worsen the situation more in the near future. Legal: The legal problems related to the case is that, the Voltage Pictures is unable to take any strict actions against the customers who leaked the pictures and what Voltage Pictures can just do is that, they can collect $ 20 from each customers for watching the movie over the internet and not any legal actions can be taken against them for downloading the movie and seeding the movie with the help of BitTorrent (Suzor, 2015). It was also declared that Dallas Buyers Club will also have to pay $600,000 in order to gain the IP address of the more than 4700 customers. Social: The social problems that are related to the policy is that, the increase in piracy will increase the amount of movies that will be leaked over the internet and also make the economy of the society weak as a result (Jacobs et al.,, 2012). The social problems that is related to the policy also states that as a result of this verdict that has been provided by the law, will increase the privacy of the movies and also increase more movies in the internet related to pornography and so on which will have a very bad influence on the society. Economical: The economical influence that is related to the policy is that, Dallas Buyers Club will lose a lot of money due to the decision as they have lost their potential viewers due to the leakage of the movie over the internet and also if this situation persists as the verdict was provided, there will be more piracy of movies over the internet and in future, the economy of the country will become more weak if this situation goes on. Stakeholders in the trial: Stakeholders: A stakeholders can be either a person, or an organization or a group which can be influenced by the decision making process of the organization either negatively or positively (Werther Jr. and Chandler, 2010). The policies that were made in this particular case have some serious effects on the stakeholders and they will be described below. Stakeholders of the case: Internet service providers: There are six internet service providers that were included in the case and the foremost of them being iiNet. The internet service providers are the sites in which the viewers are able to view the movies online and in exchange of certain amount of money. From the sites of iiNet and other internet service providing sites illegal downloads were made by more than 4700 customers and the movie was released over the internet with the help of seeding the movie from BitTorrent. More than 352,000 unlawful downloads took place during that time and so, the internet service providers like iiNet and others are considered as one of the main stakeholders of this particular case (The Sydney Morning Herald, 2017). Voltage Pictures: Another main stakeholder of the case is the copyright owner of Dallas Buyers Club which is the Voltage Pictures. The verdict by the Australian Court of Law was against the Voltage Pictures and it was said that no actions will be taken against the customers and also Voltage Pictures will have to pay $600,000 in order to get the IP address of the customers who downloaded the picture illegally (White et al., 2015). Also, it can be done that the customers who downloaded the film illegally over the internet service providers can be made to pay $ 20 each for watching the film over the internet. The Voltage Picture is the creator of the movie and the verdict that was provided by the court was mostly against them. Justice, Nye Perram: Justice Nye Perram is another stakeholder in this case with high power and he is the one in whose hands verdict was there. Nye Perram after going through everything, decided to provide verdict in favour of the customers of iiNet and other internet service providers. According to him, it was necessary for the Voltage Pictures to provide $600,000 in order to get the list of customers IP address that downloaded the movie illegally and released it over the internet and also according to the justice it can be done that the customers can pay $ 20 as a watching cost of the movie over the internet service provider. Society: The society can be termed as another stakeholder as the influence of the decision that has been made in the court of law will also have an effect on them. The society can be influenced by the piracy of the movies and in future there can be more problems that can arise as piracy of the movies like pornographic movies which are harmful for the society. Also piracy of the movies will also have a negative effect on the economy of the country as well as on the society. Customers of internet service providers: The customers of internet service providers like iiNet or the ones who downloaded the movie illegally is one of the main stakeholders of this case. The customers are the main stakeholders as more than 4700 customers have downloaded the movie illegally and seeding of the movie has been done with the help of the BitTorrent (Cheema, 2016). The main case is against the customers and the internet service providers from which the download took place. BitTorrent: BitTorrent can be regarded as another stakeholder as the movie seeding was done with the help of Bit Torrent and more than 352,000 downloads were made which were illegal. This had an influence on the revenue of Dallas Buyers Club. Federal Government: Federal Government of the country will also have an influence on the decision of the law that will be taken in the court of justice (Golder and Sawyer, 2015). The Federal Government of the country will be influenced as the economic condition of the country will be weakened with more pirated works that will take place in future due to the decision that has been made in the court of law. Identify the role and influence the stakeholders have on information policy: There are different kinds of influence that each stakeholder has on the verdict of law and they are mentioned below: Internet service providers influence: The internet service providers influence on this particular case is very high as they are the ones who have allowed the downloading of the movies by their customers and Dallas Buyers Club was downloaded by the customers of the internet service provider sites like iiNet and others. Voltage Pictures influence: Voltage picture is another stakeholder who will have high influence on the case as the Dallas Buyers Club movie belongs to them and piracy of the movie and copyright infringement has affected them the most (White et al., 2017). Justice Nye Perrams influence: Influence of Justice Nye Perram will also be high in this case as he is the decision maker of this case and the justice will be provided by him. Also, the final decision taken by him will be the verdict of the Federal court and for that reason, it can be said that Justice Nye Perram will have high influence in this case. Society influence: The influence on the society will also be high as the verdict of the court will decide the level of influence it will have on the society. In this particular case, the influence is high as more piracy in the future will make the economy of the country weak and also bad influences like pornographic films can also be pirated in future. Customers of iiNet and other sites influence: The customers of iiNet and other sites will also have a high influence in this case, as they are the reasons behind the mishap and the case. As the customers downloaded the movie and released it over BitTorrent, Voltage Pictures, who have the copyright of the movie, faced various problems. So the customers will have a high influence in this particular case (Rimmer, 2015). Bit Torrent: BitTorrent is the application with the help of which the movie seeding was done and BitTorrent being a third party in the case have low influence in this case. BitTorrent was not directly involved at all in this particular case. Movie Industry: Movie industry will also have low influence in this case as only one movie was pirated with the help of internet service providers site and not all the movies were targeted. References: Borten, C., Wallack, M. (2014). Dallas buyers club. Mis. Label. Cheema, S. (2016, March). Catch me if you can: The legal implications of the'Dallas buyers club'decision for end users, ISPs and account-holders. In Intellectual Property Forum: journal of the Intellectual and Industrial Property Society of Australia and New Zealand (No. 104, p. 42). Intellectual and Industrial Property Society of Australia and New Zealand Inc. Golder, T., Sawyer, R. (2015). Dallas Buyers Club: protecting Australian consumers from speculative invoicing. Journal of Intellectual Property Law Practice, 10(12), 896-898. Jacobs, R. S., Heuvelman, A., Tan, M., Peters, O. (2012). Digital movie piracy: A perspective on downloading behavior through social cognitive theory. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(3), 958-967. Jean, R. W. M. M. D., Valle, M., Saks, E., Garner, J., Leto, J., Borten, W. C., ... Zahn, S. (2013). DALLAS BUYERS CLUB. Pallante, M. A. (2012). The Next Great Copyright Act. Colum. JL Arts, 36, 315. Pascale, J. (2015). Dallas Buyers Club LLC v iiNet LTD (2015) FCA 317 (7 April 2015). Adel. L. Rev., 36, 589. Rimmer, M. (2015). A Submission to the Senate Legal and Constitutional Affairs Committee on the Copyright Amendment (Online Infringement) Bill 2015 (Cth). Suzor, N., Pappalardo, K., Wood, S. (2015). What now after the Dallas Buyers Club pirate claim is rejected as surreal?. The Conversation. The Sydney Morning Herald. (2017).Australian Breaking News Headlines World News Online | SMH.com.au. [online] Available at: https://www.smh.com.au [Accessed 2 May 2017]. Werther Jr, W. B., Chandler, D. (2010). Strategic corporate social responsibility: Stakeholders in a global environment. Sage publications. White, B. D., Gelinas, L. C., Shelton, W. N. (2015). In Particular Circumstances Attempting Unproven Interventions Is Permissible and Even Obligatory. The American Journal of Bioethics, 15(4), 53-55.